Op-Ed

Fulfilling Gym Requirements at AB

As students, many of us spend a lot of time participating in sports outside of school, whether it’s soccer, basketball, swimming, or other activities, and some might wonder: should doing sports outside of school fulfill our gym requirements? Currently, at ABRHS, students are required to take four years of physical education, regardless of whether they participate in sports or not. But is this policy still the best way to promote health and fitness for all students?

School gym classes are designed to teach students a variety of physical activities and fitness skills. They expose us to different sports. Relying on outside sports to fulfill gym requirements might limit students’ exposure to these diverse activities and important health lessons. By keeping the requirement, schools can ensure that all students, regardless of their extracurricular involvement, receive a comprehensive physical education. Not every student has the same access to organized sports outside of school. Factors like cost, transportation, or other personal issues can prevent some students from participating in after-school sports.

Requiring gym classes ensures that everyone benefits from physical activity and health education, creating an equitable system where no student is left behind. Some students may not enjoy sports, or they might have physical limitations or personal reasons for not participating. Gym classes provide a safe, structured environment for these students to stay active and develop healthy habits. Removing or reducing the gym requirement could leave these students without the necessary physical activity needed for their health. These classes also introduce students to activities they might not try on their own, encouraging a lifelong habit of fitness. Gym classes aren’t just about physical fitness—they also help students develop teamwork, discipline, and social skills. These lessons are valuable beyond sports and can help students succeed in many areas of life. Participating in organized sports outside of school should be recognized as fulfilling gym requirements because these activities often provide the same, if not more, physical benefits as traditional gym classes. Sports such as soccer, basketball, swimming, or track involve intense physical exertion, teamwork, and skill development, all of which contribute to a student’s overall fitness and health. When students dedicate time and effort to these activities, recognizing outside sports as equivalent to gym classes would encourage students to pursue activities they enjoy and are passionate about.

Additionally, allowing sports outside of school to count toward gym requirements can save students time and reduce scheduling conflicts, giving them more flexibility to balance academics, extracurriculars, and personal interests. Overall, since organized sports outside of school promote physical fitness, teamwork, and discipline, they should be considered a valid and effective way to fulfill gym obligations, providing a comprehensive approach to student health without the need for mandatory indoor gym classes. Maintaining the four-year gym requirement and participating in school-sports helps promote lifelong healthy habits and ensures every student has the opportunity to learn, grow, and stay active both in and out of the classroom.

More in Op-Ed

View All Op-Ed →
Op-Ed

School Subject Colors

This debate has raged on for years, decades, even centuries. This debate has infected...

Op-Ed

Firing Squad Returns

Picture this: A person is strapped into a chair, wrists bound, chest bare except...